B15) The Dutch Election Picture, wrongly interpreted or a deception? Detailed notes, (S. Dobbs, 7th April 2017):

I need to apologise for the Dutch election word that I sent out, which was based on a picture I received twelve days before that election. It was definitely wrong and not of God. I was moving in presumption. I had made a conscious decision to hand that out even though I hadn’t received any discernment on it.  There was not much time left before that election and I was overly keen that people pray about it in order to help bring the E.U down. The picture was also very convincing as it appeared to parallel all the political analysis that I and most commentators expected concerning that election. As time was short I had to either ignore what appeared an urgent word or run with it. I made a very bad call. Whilst depressing this may be a good thing in the long run as it’s revealed that my attitude was becoming quite slack. I’m now resolved to not share or put any more prophecies online unless I have very clear and detailed discernment on them. As clear discernment seems to be getting increasingly hard to come by in this atmosphere I’m not sure how that is going to pan out in the future. If that means that I never put anything online again so be it. I also intend to focus, in the coming season, on retesting the existing words online by re seeking discernment on them again, to double check everything, (God willing), although I remain very confident of those.

I still haven’t got any discernment on that Dutch picture yet though. Whilst it may have been just the interpretation that was wrong I am inclined to believe the picture itself was a deception. If that is the case then the other picture I sent out with it, about the French election, must also be a deception too as they both came together. I am posting this out now, whilst I’m still uncertain, so this is available in advance of the French election, which is in two weeks’ time. I have put more detailed notes below to help anyone who wants to weigh this up for themselves. Apologies again for sending the Dutch and French picture/words out like that.

Kind Regards,

God bless,

Steve Dobbs, 7th April, 2017.

 

Detailed Notes:

A deceptive picture or a false interpretation of a correct picture? Ironically this, as a case study, could help people involved in testing prophecies generally, as it reflects two different ways of being deceived, either together or separately, so a small silver lining may exist here.

This is what I emailed out on the Dutch election: “I saw that although Wilders PVV Party was operating in a very hostile spiritual environment it was not blocked from stepping forwards towards its goal by this. The main problem was that there was nowhere on the ground ahead on which it could place its feet. The ground would just sink and disappear when attempts were made to do this. We, therefore, need to pray for firmer ground, for earthbound coalition alliances with other parties to become possible for the PVV.” The first part is an inadequate, summarised description of what I saw. The part in red is where I added my own interpretation to this based on my earlier political analysis.

This is the entire Dutch picture, as I first saw it, on its own, without my added interpretation: I very rarely seek God for major prophecies and this one came as I was lying down seeking healing from God and not even thinking about the forthcoming election:  “I saw a picture of a man walking forwards which I immediately understood represented Wilders and his anti E.U, PVV Party. The air, (spiritual atmosphere), in this picture was hostile towards the man but unable to prevent his progress. There was firm ground beneath his feet up to where he had walked so far. However, about nine inches or so in front of the man the ground was going to give way when he tried to step forwards onto it, that ground was going to vanish, it was as if it wasn’t really there.

This is how I deduced my additional interpretation, concerning the ground, from my mind: As I did not seek a word on this election, (I rarely seek major words), I wasn’t, therefore, expecting to receive a prophecy by that late stage.  I undertook some political research instead, for motivation and so I would have a better idea about what to pray for. Having previously analysed the Trump election correctly, in advance, I think I was buoyed up with too much confidence in my abilities as a political analyst. I think this added to my sense of confidence in my mental interpretation of that picture, which presented itself as almost obvious. For over five months, both political commentators and the polls had consistently indicated that Wilders and his anti E.U PVV Party would win the most seats in that election. I assumed that this was the firm ground under the man’s feet in the picture. It just seemed obvious at the time but proved to be wrong. However, since all of the other parties said they would not be willing to join a PVV led coalition the PVV would not have been able to form the next government even if they did win the most seats as expected. In the rush to get this word out I assumed that that would be the ground disappearing from under the PVV’s feet as they attempted to move forward in the future. I included those two presumptions as part of the prophecy, which I certainly shouldn’t have done, as they were based on political observations. As I normally receive interpretations at the same time as any pictures I am not in the habit of having to seek interpretations from God. No actual interpretation for the ground came with that picture. Instead I read into it what I, (wrongly), thought I knew about that election.  This also stimulated me to take a risk and act in presumption. I had also started to think that over the last 17 yr’s God must have been giving me extra help to assure that I wasn’t making any mistakes, which further boosted my over confidence in acting this time without any discernment.

Here’s how the picture does appear to have mirrored the real events that followed, though: It is still possible that the picture was of God but the interpretation wrong. The ground did seem to suddenly disappear from under Wilders and the PVV’s feet. Just three days before that Dutch election the polls suddenly showed a 50% drop in support for Wilders PVV Party. This occurred as a spat developed between the Dutch government and Turkeys Islamic President Erdogan, who then stated that the Dutch were “Nazis,” the Netherlands “a banana republic” and their soldiers “cowards.” The next day many Turks living in the Netherlands, many of whom have joint Dutch citizenship, (there are almost half a million in total), went on a protest march in support of Erdogan. This turned violent and had to be put down by the police. That is what we have been led to believe changed public opinion in favour of the pro E.U government VVD Party even though they supported the E.U’s immigration policy. Since those events should surely have favoured the anti-Islamic PVV instead some believe that vote rigging may have taken place, (some state that the statistical impossibilities of a 100% voter turnout reported in some regions back up this).  It is possible that in order to prevent a third domino effect after the anti E.U victory of Brexit and Trump the pro E.U government and bureaucracy in the Netherlands may have assisted the E.U in rigging that election, especially as the vital French election was to follow.  Either way, whether via vote rigging or just an unexpected change in opinion against the PVV, this could be viewed as reflecting the symbolism of the ground unexpectedly disappearing from under Wilders and the PVV Parties feet as seen in that picture. If that is the case it is possibly then that only the interpretation for that Dutch picture was wrong. The following French picture could then be of God.

Conclusion: It is tempting to conclude that it was only the interpretation that was wrong. Whilst I can’t be sure until/unless I received clear discernment on this it appears far more likely to me that the entire thing was a deceptive set up. I think it was probably the case that the picture itself was a deception, designed to fit in with, and stimulate me into trusting, my faulty political analysis as the interpretation for the ground disappearing in that picture.  If that is the case then the following French election prophecy must also be a deception too since they both came together in the same (false?), anointing.

Here is the 2nd Picture for France: "I saw a picture of the far right wing politician Marine Le Pen walking along, with someone else walking close by in the same direction, on the other side of her. She was doing well and only slightly behind this other figure in the race for the French Presidency. The ground beneath Le Pens feet was solid, just a little rough and rocky. Although she didn’t appear to be aware of this there was, however, an intense spiritual bombardment from the Kingdom of Darkness against her, to prevent her future progress.  The intensity was such that, unless checked through prayer, it would become overwhelming in the near future, making it impossible for her to win that election. In an adjoining picture I saw that the shear force and ferocity of the spiritual bombardment would turn too many people’s faces away from her in favour of the other person in the picture." In France, in the main we, therefore, need to pray against the influences of spiritual darkness and how these will have a negative effect on voter’s perceptions of Marine Le Pen, in order to open the, to make it possible for her to win. There was no presumption in this interpretation, it all came with the pictures but that doesn’t mean this is of God. I’ve have an uncomfortable feeling about this picture as I look at it now but still not clear enough  discernment on it to date. I will leave all this with the reader to weigh up.

Apologies again for sending these out in that manner.

Kind Regards,

God bless,

Steve Dobbs, 7th April, 2017.